Showing posts with label multiculturalism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label multiculturalism. Show all posts
Sunday, June 9, 2013
[video] Pressed Rat and Warthog: the Obama Administration
Scandals, controversies, and cover-ups. It's time to close down their shop!
Sunday, October 28, 2012
Sober Up in 2012, America!!
Remix of Tool's classic song, "Sober"--as it relates to the Obamacrat Regime.
Thursday, August 2, 2012
Can I get a "boom-shocka-locka-locka"?!
The Hon. James David Manning, PhD gives a "call to arms" for white people of truth. This message was preached on 12 June 2008 on the Temple Hour of Prayer.
Wednesday, July 4, 2012
video: Bill Whittle on Gen 44
In the video clip below, Bill Whittle shares his concerns about how we have failed the Millenial Generation; based upon his reading of their comments in the blogosphere and observing their addiction to texting.
Wednesday, June 13, 2012
When Occupiers go off their meds
Any legitimate message that the Occupy Movement originally had was soon eclipsed by the actions of looney-toon rent seeker groups who wanted to take advantage of the media coverage and the party atmosphere. This video clip illustrates what happens when someone tries to inject some "real world" education into the minds of misguided youth:
Sunday, May 20, 2012
AGENDA 21: "SUSTAINABLE" TOTALITARIANISM
read: RIO+20: The Boyz from Brazil
When I began watching the clip below, I thought I was watching a comical parody of the Zeitgeisters---and the other useful idiots---that are being used to advance global totalitarianism. Watching the clip to the very end, I soon realized that it was not meant to be a parody, simply the presentation of life under a green "solution."
When I began watching the clip below, I thought I was watching a comical parody of the Zeitgeisters---and the other useful idiots---that are being used to advance global totalitarianism. Watching the clip to the very end, I soon realized that it was not meant to be a parody, simply the presentation of life under a green "solution."
Thank god that others see through the lunacy of the Green Totalitarians:
Tuesday, May 15, 2012
Corruption of democracy in No Carolina
O'Keefe's Project Veritas exposes voter fraud and corruption of the democratic process in North Carolina:
Wednesday, April 18, 2012
Limiting Muslim Immigration Simply Makes Sense
"We do NOT Advocate Ending Muslim Immigration" <---ACT! quote
Because The Left has joined forces with The Muslim Brotherhood, our "progressive" media does not normally inform the public of the problems caused by Islamization. Therefore, the job of educating the public to the threat of radical Islam has been left to patriotic grassroots organizations and citizen journalists like the late Andrew Breitbart...
read the rest-->
Because The Left has joined forces with The Muslim Brotherhood, our "progressive" media does not normally inform the public of the problems caused by Islamization. Therefore, the job of educating the public to the threat of radical Islam has been left to patriotic grassroots organizations and citizen journalists like the late Andrew Breitbart...
read the rest-->
Wednesday, April 11, 2012
Former East German describes where America is headed
When I was a young, clueless, anti-establishment type in the early 70s, I had a flirtatious infatuation with marxist theory; it sounded like a "fair" and viable socio-political economic system for a large agrarian-based population.
Then, I learned that in any "real world" situation involving human nature, there is often a big difference between something sounding good in "theory" and how it works in "practice." Free-market capitalism isn't "perfect"---because it involves "imperfect" people. But it works a helluva a lot better than any other political economic system: to create the greatest amount of prosperity for the greatest number of people, with the greatest amount of freedom.
Would someone please inform our President that history has proven that government-delivered socialism and the nationalization of industries and resources DOESN'T WORK!
Then, I learned that in any "real world" situation involving human nature, there is often a big difference between something sounding good in "theory" and how it works in "practice." Free-market capitalism isn't "perfect"---because it involves "imperfect" people. But it works a helluva a lot better than any other political economic system: to create the greatest amount of prosperity for the greatest number of people, with the greatest amount of freedom.
Would someone please inform our President that history has proven that government-delivered socialism and the nationalization of industries and resources DOESN'T WORK!
Wednesday, March 21, 2012
Race and Rhetoric by Thomas Sowell
» Sowell: Race and Rhetoric » Commentary -- GOPUSA:
"...While many politicians and "leaders" have claimed credit for black progress, no one seems to be willing to take the blame for the retrogressions represented by higher unemployment rates, higher crime rates, and higher rates of imprisonment today. Or for the disintegration of the black family, which survived centuries of slavery and generations of government-imposed discrimination in the Jim Crow era, but began coming apart in the wake of the expansion of the liberal welfare state and its accompanying social dogmas..."
Saturday, March 17, 2012
Voter ID Laws Prevent Fraud: So why are Obamacrats against them?
» Brown: Voter ID Laws Protect Electoral Process » Commentary -- GOPUSA:
"...It did not matter to the DOJ that an estimated 160,000 to 333,000 non-citizens were illegally registered to vote in Texas in 2008. But then again, this is the DOJ of Attorney General Holder — who was all about repressing the white vote when he dismissed the Black Panther Party case -- because he thought it demeaned "my people." With that in mind, no one should be surprised by Holder's state-by-state whack-a-mole game to exterminate voter ID laws..."read the rest HERE
Thursday, March 1, 2012
Hating the "Happy Warrior": a hobby for Leftists
KUDOS to all those courageous Americans who speak truth to power, and are excoriated by Leftist loons---and the Left-controlled mass media---for daring to speak it. Andrew Breitbart was HATED by Progressive lemmings, by radical socialists (commies), by poverty pimps, and by the corrupt Liberal mass media he exposed. The Happy Warrior will be sorely missed, and America owes a great debt to this patriot---for exposing the corruption and deception that he did, in his short 43 years: despite all the hateful personal attacks and death threats by the "tolerant" Left. He is gone now, but because of his courage and patriotism, a thousand new flowers will bloom in each of his footsteps; and they will carry-on his work.
Sudden passing of a great patriot: You will be missed Andrew!
Rest in Peace, Andrew.
You were an inspiration to Conservatives and investigative journalists everywhere---and you still are. Condolences to your family and friends.
You were an inspiration to Conservatives and investigative journalists everywhere---and you still are. Condolences to your family and friends.
Sunday, February 19, 2012
Immigration Enforcement does not equate to "hate"
A great clip taking an honest look at the illegal alien problem in America. The first step in solving the problem is to quit referring to these economic invaders as either "undocumented" or "immigrants." Is a drug dealer "slinging rock" out on the streets referred to as an "undocumented pharmacist"? Is a home-invader referred to as an "undocumented guest"? Are European or Japanese tourists in the US referred to as "temporary immigrants"?
For every personal anecdote about a hard-working, friendly neighbor who happens to be in the country ILLEGALLY, there are numerous personal anecdotes from victims of property crimes and physical injury crimes committed by an illegal alien.
Thursday, January 26, 2012
"Islam's" Contributions to Western Civilization??
From a great piece by Counter-Jihad: Beyond the EDL
"...‘Let me highlight a handful of Islam’s contributions to Western culture. The guitar. Cough syrup. The university. Algebra. Mocha coffee...’
- Irshad Manji, from her The Trouble With Islam Today
This is one of the most common and annoying mistakes you can find in defence of Islam.
How can Islam itself have contributed the guitar, cough syrup, algebra, etc. to ‘Western culture’? How can a religion, or the Koran, the hadiths, etc. have contributed these things? How can even the affects of Islam, the Koran, etc. have done so? It is absolutely ridiculous to claim that Islam, a religion primarily based on the Koran, could have had an hand in the invention of the guitar, algebra, cough syrup syrup, etc. Which passages in the Koran, or the hadiths, etc. helped contribute to the creation of algebra? Which passages helped inspire the invention of cough syrup? Again, this is plain silly!..."
Read the rest of this insightful piece!
Monday, January 16, 2012
Is it "Islamophobia"...or rational and reasonable "concern"?
The word (and suffix) "phobia" was originally used by psychologists to denote "an irrational fear" of some object, substance, animal, situation, person(s), or place...etc. The key word in that definition was "irrational": meaning a lack of rational or reasonable basis for the fear. However, from the psychologist's point of view, it is still very reasonable and rational to experience fear---or to be concerned with---certain "things", people, or situations that are dangerous (i.e. pose a threat to life, limb, family, or property): it simply means your instinctual drive for self-survival (or "genetic survival") is engaged with your intellect.
Over the last few decades, however, usage of the suffix "phobia" was appropriated and distorted by political activists to mean: " irrational fear and/or hostility, prejudice, or hatred of." The intended meaning of any word created with the suffix "phobia" is now rather fuzzy; hostility is not the same as fear; prejudice is not the same as hatred; cognition is not the same as action.
In the public arena, usage of the term "Islamophobia" is very much in vogue these days . So, let's take an objective look at the veracity of the term---as it is often used by "Progressives" and Islamists today: in reference to criticizisms of the ideology of Islam or the spread of Islam throughout the world. Is it now irrational to question or opine?
Or conversely, is it actually reasonable and rational for non-Muslims to have---and express---some concerns about the ideology of "Islam"? Is it reasonable and rational for them to have concerns about the Islamic mandate to spread Islam? And most importantly, does the fundamental ideology of Islam---including its self-mandated Expansion---pose a danger or threat to the life, limb, family members, or prosperity of non-Muslims?
Below are 2 video clips currently posted on youTube (although they may get yanked) that were made by Muslims FOR Muslims. [Unfortunately, the first one is in Arabic, so we must trust that the on-screen translation is accurate. The second one, however, is in English, and was made for English-speaking Muslims living in the UK and the USA.]
Many "Westerners" are completely unconcerned about the underlying ideology of Islam, or about the IMPORTATION of Islamism through immigration policy. What they NEED to know is that ISLAM is very concerned with THEM.
If you are a non-Muslim (infidel), get EDUCATED about YOUR ASSIGNED ROLE as a dhimmi under the ideology of Islam, and THEN decide if it is reasonable and rational for YOU to have concerns---and do something about those concerns; even if you are then IRRATIONALLY labeled an Islamophobe.
Over the last few decades, however, usage of the suffix "phobia" was appropriated and distorted by political activists to mean: " irrational fear and/or hostility, prejudice, or hatred of." The intended meaning of any word created with the suffix "phobia" is now rather fuzzy; hostility is not the same as fear; prejudice is not the same as hatred; cognition is not the same as action.
In the public arena, usage of the term "Islamophobia" is very much in vogue these days . So, let's take an objective look at the veracity of the term---as it is often used by "Progressives" and Islamists today: in reference to criticizisms of the ideology of Islam or the spread of Islam throughout the world. Is it now irrational to question or opine?
Or conversely, is it actually reasonable and rational for non-Muslims to have---and express---some concerns about the ideology of "Islam"? Is it reasonable and rational for them to have concerns about the Islamic mandate to spread Islam? And most importantly, does the fundamental ideology of Islam---including its self-mandated Expansion---pose a danger or threat to the life, limb, family members, or prosperity of non-Muslims?
Below are 2 video clips currently posted on youTube (although they may get yanked) that were made by Muslims FOR Muslims. [Unfortunately, the first one is in Arabic, so we must trust that the on-screen translation is accurate. The second one, however, is in English, and was made for English-speaking Muslims living in the UK and the USA.]
Many "Westerners" are completely unconcerned about the underlying ideology of Islam, or about the IMPORTATION of Islamism through immigration policy. What they NEED to know is that ISLAM is very concerned with THEM.
If you are a non-Muslim (infidel), get EDUCATED about YOUR ASSIGNED ROLE as a dhimmi under the ideology of Islam, and THEN decide if it is reasonable and rational for YOU to have concerns---and do something about those concerns; even if you are then IRRATIONALLY labeled an Islamophobe.
Friday, January 13, 2012
Hillary Clinton Pushes to Make Criticism of Islam a Crime in the US
Our Progressive, global-village-idiot, Hillary Clinton, is at it again. This time, she wants to help the UN advance its NWO agenda to criminalize any criticism of Islam throughout the world---including the United States. Apparently she laughs at the idea of freedom of speech in America, and the idea that the US Constitution is the law of OUR land; not the dictates of a corrupt "governing" body like the UN. I am an American, Hillary; not a "citizen" of the world.
[...] "Secretary of State Hillary Clinton is due to host OIC Secretary General Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu in Washington, DC in mid-December 2011 to discuss how the United States can implement the OIC agenda to criminalize criticism of Islam. Cloaked in the sanctimonious language of “Resolution 16/18,” that was adopted by the UN Human Rights Council in April 2011, the WDC three-day experts meeting is billed as a working session to discuss legal mechanisms to combat religious discrimination (but the only religion the Human Rights Council has ever mentioned in any previous resolution is Islam). The UN Human Rights Council, which includes such bastions of human rights as China, Cuba, Libya, Pakistan, and Saudi Arabia, introduced Resolution 16/18 to the UN General Assembly (UNGA), where it was passed in March 2011..."
Read the rest of this informative article here.
by snipe Posted December 11, 2011[...] "Secretary of State Hillary Clinton is due to host OIC Secretary General Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu in Washington, DC in mid-December 2011 to discuss how the United States can implement the OIC agenda to criminalize criticism of Islam. Cloaked in the sanctimonious language of “Resolution 16/18,” that was adopted by the UN Human Rights Council in April 2011, the WDC three-day experts meeting is billed as a working session to discuss legal mechanisms to combat religious discrimination (but the only religion the Human Rights Council has ever mentioned in any previous resolution is Islam). The UN Human Rights Council, which includes such bastions of human rights as China, Cuba, Libya, Pakistan, and Saudi Arabia, introduced Resolution 16/18 to the UN General Assembly (UNGA), where it was passed in March 2011..."
Read the rest of this informative article here.
Friday, January 6, 2012
Thursday, December 8, 2011
Email Newt and Tell Him to Scrap his Amnesty Plan
Newt's Amnesty Plan
This should be distressing to all conservatives and American patriots:
What is Newt thinking?
Beware of Bogus Polls that indicate a mjority of Americans favor Amnesty:
This should be distressing to all conservatives and American patriots:
"...Unless Gingrich supporters push him to back off, he is promising a bigger amnesty than the giant blanket amnesty of 1986 that was supposed to be the first and last one ever.
Hopefully, his supporters can talk him into cutting out at least 90% of his amnesty.
We have no way to set up faxing to candidate Gingrich, but you can send an email to him at:
http://www.newt.org/contact. Click on the "Platform" option and let him know what you want him to change and how you feel about his immigration platform..."What kind of a message does it send to those people in our country who have jumped through all the bureaucratic hoops to LEGALLY enter and remain in America if the Feds grant another blanket amnesty to the millions of foreign criminals who have ignored and disrespected our immigration laws? Do you think another blanket amnesty would discourage---or encourage---more illegal immigration?
What is Newt thinking?
Beware of Bogus Polls that indicate a mjority of Americans favor Amnesty:
"...The pollsters have a single "Big Trick" that skews all the results:It looks as though Newt Gingrich has a very good chance of getting the Republican nomination. Let him know that he needs to change his current stand on immigration policy. Tell your current elected officials that Amnesty is NOT the solution to illegal immigration: Attrition through Enforcement is.
The polls don't give voters the option of Attrition Through Enforcement.
Instead, they make voters basically choose between mass deportations or mass legalizations. In the case of a National Journal poll just released, voters were given a third choice of half-mass deportations and half-mass legalizations (which is essentially the Gingrich Amnesty).
But nowhere do voters hear that there is an Attrition Through Enforcement option that doesn't involve mass deportations or mass legalizations..."
Thursday, December 1, 2011
THE NWO is the dark shadow cast by Globalization
NAFTA was just the beginning. The eventual formation of a North American Union was the ultimate goal.
An Open Borders policy between NAU members---like the one the European Union has---would destroy American sovereignty and pollute our culture. They would both become sacrificial lambs on the altar of Davos Globalization.
In the video clip below, Jerome Corsi offers a great explanation of how the SPP was intended to advance The New World Order--controlled by Davos Men.
An Open Borders policy between NAU members---like the one the European Union has---would destroy American sovereignty and pollute our culture. They would both become sacrificial lambs on the altar of Davos Globalization.
In the video clip below, Jerome Corsi offers a great explanation of how the SPP was intended to advance The New World Order--controlled by Davos Men.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)




